I am more a developer than a data science or ML person. I got a question to ask and I am not exactly asking for an answer to a close-ended question. More like I am asking for directions for a more open-ended quest.
I have a situation where I have a script that reads a PDF to look for a particular. It then takes that quote number and assumes it's correctly inputted from the 3rd party and then looks up a database that I control to find the corresponding data row and its expected total value.
Then performs a comparison: is the total value in the PDF the same as the total value expected in the database?
That’s all the script does. And to look for the quote number in the PDF the script uses regex.
Now this is all fine and dandy if the PDF is machine generated with a consistent formatting. However, I faced occasional issues (like around 1 in 100 cases) where there’s typo or misspelling.
The misspelling causes thenot to be found even though it is actually there.
The logic is
Quote: [The quote number is actually here]but I get misspellings such as
Qoute:[The quote number is actually here]. I have tried to patch this with increasing the regex but it will never be exhaustive.
There are also typos in the quote number itself.
But they show
And the unfortunate thing is sometimes, there are actual data rows that match the typo causing the wrong comparisons.
I have never implemented any ML before and I also not sure whether it’s even worth it. Right now it’s more like human discovery of error after the fact to correct this kind of mistakes.
So my question is: How do I evaluate if I should consider ML in a situation like the above and if so what kind should I be looking at? HOw do I consider the tradeoffs? Assume I am totally new to ML.
Hey K, thanks for reaching out! I think in this case, you have an excellent solution already—99% recall (i.e., error in 1 out of 100) is a great result.
Now, about those errors:
About errors in the quote number itself: This is tricky.
In both cases, I think using deterministic logic is far simpler, faster, and easier than machine learning. ML will have some error, and would be unlikely to improve on the 99% recall that you already have.
So from your working experience, it’s okay not to achieve 100% recall.
So even with deep learning solutions, there’s an acceptance within your field not to hit 100% yes?
Yes, of course! IMO 99% recall is excellent.
Have a question for me? Happy to answer concise questions via email on topics I know about. More details in How I Can Help.
Join 3,200+ readers getting updates on data science, data/ML systems, and career.
Welcome gift: 5-day email course on How to be an Effective Data Scientist 🚀